{"id":1303,"date":"2024-07-08T12:44:04","date_gmt":"2024-07-08T12:44:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/umfcd.inobox.ro\/?post_type=lucrari_cercetari&p=1303"},"modified":"2024-09-26T13:12:05","modified_gmt":"2024-09-26T13:12:05","slug":"comparative-analysis-of-four-different-intraoral-scanners-an-in-vitro-study","status":"publish","type":"lucrari_cercetari","link":"https:\/\/cicds.umfcd.ro\/en\/lucrari_cercetari\/comparative-analysis-of-four-different-intraoral-scanners-an-in-vitro-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Comparative Analysis of Four Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Comparative Analysis of Four Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study<\/h1>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tLucian Toma Ciocan 1<\/sup> , Vlad Gabriel Vasilescu 1,*<\/sup>, Sabina-Ana R\u0103ut,\u0103\n2<\/sup>, Mihaela Pantea 3,*<\/sup> , Silviu-Mirel Pit,uru 4<\/sup>\nand Marina Imre 3<\/sup>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

1<\/sup> Discipline of Dental Prosthetics Technology, Faculty of Dentistry, \u201cCarol Davila\u201d University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dionisie Lupu Street, No. 37, District 2, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; lucian.ciocan@umfcd.ro
2<\/sup> Faculty of Dentistry, \u201cCarol Davila\u201d University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dionisie Lupu Street, No. 37, District 2, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; sabina.rauta@stud.umfcd.ro
3<\/sup> Discipline of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, \u201cCarol Davila\u201d University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dionisie Lupu Street, No. 37, District 2, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; marina.imre@umfcd.ro
4<\/sup> Discipline of Organization, Professional Legislation and Dental Office Management, \u201cCarol Davila\u201d University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dionisie Lupu Street, No. 37, District 2, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; silviu.pituru@umfcd.ro
*<\/sup> Correspondence: vlad.vasilescu@umfcd.ro (V.G.V.); mihaela.pantea@umfcd.ro (M.P.); Tel.: +40-745327700 (V.G.V.)\u00a0<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAbstract\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t(1) Background: Intraoral scanners undergo rapid advancements in hardware and software, prompting frequent updates by manufacturers. (2) Aim: This study aimed to quantitatively assess the precision of full dental arch digital impressions obtained from four different intraoral scanners: Trios 5\u20143SHAPE, Copenhagen, Denmark, CEREC Primescan\u2014 Dentsply Sirona, New York, NY, USA, Planmeca Emerald S\u2014Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland, and Medit i700\u2014Medit Corp, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (3) Methods: A maxillary virtual dental model (digital master model) was created in accordance with ISO standard 20896-1. Subsequently, a 3D-printed model was obtained from the master model\u2019s STL file and scanned 15 times consecutively with each scanner. STL files were aligned with the master model\u2019s STL using Medit Link\u2014Medit Design software v.3.1.0. The accuracy was evaluated by measuring deviations in micrometers between each scanner\u2019s scans and the master model. (4) Results: The study revealed variations in accuracy ranging from 23 to 32 \u00b5m across scans of the same dental arch, irrespective of the scanner used and scanning strategy employed. The anterior regions exhibited higher precision (Mean Absolute Deviation of 112 \u00b5m) compared to the posterior regions (Mean Absolute Deviation of 127 \u00b5m). Trios 5 demonstrated the smallest deviation (average 112 \u00b5m), indicating superior accuracy among the scanners tested. Emerald S and Medit i700 exhibited balanced performance (average 117 \u00b5m and 114 \u00b5m, respectively), while Primescan consistently displayed high deviation (average 127 \u00b5m). (5) Conclusions: Based on clinically accepted thresholds for accuracy in intraoral scanning, which are typically 200 \u00b5m for full arch scans, Trios 5 surpasses these benchmarks with its average deviation falling within the 200 \u00b5m range. Emerald S and Medit i700 also meet these standards, while Primescan, although showing high overall deviation, approaches the upper limit of clinical acceptability. Considering the limitations of an in vitro investigation, the findings demonstrate that each intraoral scanner under evaluation is capable of reliably and consistently capturing a full arch scan for dentate patients.\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tKeywords: prosthodontics; digital impression; accuracy; intraoral scanner; ISO assessment; dental arch\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tRead the paper online<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/path><\/svg>\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDownload paper\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"lucrari_cercetari_cat":[],"class_list":["post-1303","lucrari_cercetari","type-lucrari_cercetari","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cicds.umfcd.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/lucrari_cercetari\/1303","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cicds.umfcd.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/lucrari_cercetari"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cicds.umfcd.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/lucrari_cercetari"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/cicds.umfcd.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/lucrari_cercetari\/1303\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2213,"href":"https:\/\/cicds.umfcd.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/lucrari_cercetari\/1303\/revisions\/2213"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cicds.umfcd.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"lucrari_cercetari_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cicds.umfcd.ro\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/lucrari_cercetari_cat?post=1303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}